Evidentiality in the discourse. Setting boundaries

  1. Lidia Mañoso-Pacheco
  2. Roberto Sánchez-Cabrero
  3. Amaya Arigita García
  4. Francisco Javier Pericacho Gómez
Revista:
Quaestiones Disputatae - Temas en debate

ISSN: 2422-2186,  2011-0472

Año de publicación: 2020

Volumen: 13

Número: 26

Páginas: 58-77

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Quaestiones Disputatae - Temas en debate

Resumen

Apesar da extensa investigação que tem sido feita sobre o fenómeno da evidência no discurso, ou seja, a codificação da fonte de informação, ainda existem discrepâncias terminológicas e conceptuais que precisam de ser consideradas. Este artigo apresenta uma discussão teórica de probabilidades. Começa com um exame do campo da evidência em termos gramaticais e semânticos, terminando com uma compreensão completa do conceito como um domínio funcional-conceptual. A discussão centra-se também na relação entre a evidência e o modo epistémico, uma vez que esta é ainda uma questão em aberto no terreno. Apoiamos que sería necessário um estudo abrangente de formas probatórias concretas, tais como a apresentação de provas, como uma continuação dinâmica desta revisão bibliográfica.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aikhenvald, A. (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Aikhenvald, A. (2006). Evidentiality in grammar. In K. Brown (eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 4. 320-325. Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Aikhenvald, A. (2015). Evidentials: Their links with other grammatical categories. Linguistic Typology 19(2). 239-277.
  • Aikhenvald, A. (2018). Evidentiality and language contact. In Aikhenvald, A. (ed.) Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality, 148-172. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Anderson, L. (1986). Evidentials, paths of change, and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries. In Chafe, W., J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The Linguistic Encoding of Epistemology, 273-312. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Ballesteros, A. (2004). Evidence, truth, and power in the speeches of the XVII century in Britain. In Marín-Arrese, J. (ed.) Perspectives on Evidentiality and Modality, 79-95. Madrid: Editorial Complutense.
  • Barrios, M. J. (2017). The Combination of Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality in Spanish. The Use of Probability Markers and Cognitive Verbs to Express Uncertainty. In Marín-Arrese, J. et al. (eds). (2017). Evidentiality and Modality in European Languages. Discourse-pragmatic perspectives, 335-370. Bern: Peter Lang.
  • Boas, F. (1938). Language. In Boas, F. (ed.) General anthropology 124–145. Boston and New York: D. C. Heath.
  • Boye, K. and P. Harder. (2009). Evidentiality: Linguistic categories and grammaticalization. Functions of Language 16. 9-43.
  • Boye, K. (2012). Epistemic Meaning: A Crosslinguistic and Functional-Cognitive Study. Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
  • Brugman, C. and M. Macaulay. (2015). Characterizing evidentiality. Linguistic Typology 19(2). 201-237.
  • Bybee, J, Perkins, R., and W. Pagliuca (1994). The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Carretero, M. and J. R. Zamorano-Mansilla. (2016). Evidentiality as conversational implicature: Implications for corpus annotation. Social and Behavioral Sciences 212. 146-150.
  • Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In Chafe, W., J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, 261-272. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Chafe, W., and J. Nichols (eds.) (1986). Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Chojnicka, J. (2012). Reportive evidentiality and reported speech: is there a boundary? Evidence of the Latvian oblique. In Usonienė, A., N. Nau and I. Dabašinskienė (eds.) Multiple Perspectives in Linguistic Research on Baltic Languages, 170–192. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Coates, J. (1983). The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.
  • Cornillie, B. (2009). Evidentiality and epistemic modality: On the close relationship of two different categories. Functions of Language. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins 16(1). 44-62.
  • Cornillie, B., Marín-Arrese, J. and B. Wiemer. (2015). Evidentiality and the semantics-pragmatics interface. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 29. 1-17.
  • De Haan, F. (1999). Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18. 83-101.
  • Delancey, S. (2001). The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 369-382.
  • Dendale, P. and L. Tasmowski. (2001). Introduction: evidentiality and related notions. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 339–348.
  • Donabédian, A. (2001). Toward a semasiological account of evidentials: An enounciative approach of –er in modern western. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 421-42.
  • Faller, M. (2002). Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. Stanford, CA dissertation.
  • Fetzer, A. and O. Etsuko. (2014). Evidentiality in discourse. Intercultural Pragmatics 11(3). 321-332.
  • Fitneva, S. (2001). Epistemic marking and reliability judgments: Evidence from Bulgarian. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 401-420.
  • Floyd, R. (1996). Experience, certainty, and control, and the direct evidential in Wanka Quechua questions. Functions of language 3, 1. 69-93
  • González, M. et al. (2017). Epistemic and evidential marking in discourse: Effects of register and debatability. Lingua 186/187. 68-87.
  • Guentchéva, Z. (ed.). (1996). L’Énonciation Médiatisée. Louvain : Peeters.
  • Hansson, S. O. 2018. How to reconcile the multiculturalist and universalist approaches to science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(2). 517-523.
  • Hirschová, M. (2013). Sentence adverbials and evidentiality. Research in Language 11(2). 131-140.
  • Ifantidou, E. (2001). Evidentials and Relevance. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Jakobson, R. (1957). Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. Harvard University: Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures.
  • Lazard, G. (2001). On the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 359-67.
  • Liu, Z. (2016). Evidentials in Chinese. International Journal of Linguistics 8(2). Retrieved from http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijl/article/view/8959 (accessed 04-11-2018).
  • Mañoso-Pacheco, L. and Juárez-Escribano, B. (2019). Reportive evidentiality. A theoretical revision. Revista Inclusiones 6(4). 189-206.
  • Marín-Arrese, J. (ed.) (2004). Perspectives on Evidentiality and Modality. Madrid: Editorial Complutense.
  • Marín-Arrese, J. et al. (eds) (2017). Evidentiality and Modality in European Languages. Discourse-pragmatic perspectives. Bern: Peter Lang.
  • Matlock, T. (1989). Metaphor and the grammaticalization of evidentials. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society 15. 215-225.
  • Mithun, M. (1986). Evidential diachrony in Northern Iroquoian. In Wallace C. and J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 89-112. Norwood: Ablex.
  • Nuyts, J. (2001). Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 383-400.
  • Palmer, F. (2001). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Palmer, F. (1990). Modality and the English Modals. London and New York: Longman.
  • Plungian, V. (2001). The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 349-57.
  • Przyjemski, K. (2017). Strong Epistemic Possibility and Evidentiality. Topoi 36(1). 183-195.
  • Roseano, P. et al. (2016). Communicating epistemic stance: how speech and gesture patterns reflect epistemicity and evidentiality. Discourse Process 53(3). 135-74.
  • San Roque, L., and S. I. Floyd (2017). Evidentiality and interrogativity. Lingua: An International Review of General Linguistics 186/187. 120-143.
  • Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.
  • Speas, P. (2004). Evidential paradigms, world variables and person agreement features. The Italian Journal of Linguistics 16(1).
  • Squartini, M. (2008). Lexical vs. grammatical evidentiality in French and Italian. Linguistics 46-5 (2008). 917-947.
  • The Guardian (19/02/2014). Concerns over chemicals in food packaging misplaced, say scientists. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2014/feb/19/chemicals-food-packaging-scientists (accessed 05-03-2014)
  • Tournadre, N. and R. LaPolla (2014). Towards a new approach to evidentiality: Issues and directions for research. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(2). 240-263.
  • Van der Auwera, J., and V. Plungian (1998). Modality's semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2. 79-124
  • Vet, C. (1988). Book review of Wallace Chafe and Johanna Nichols, 1986. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 33. 65-77.
  • Vliegen, M. (2011). ‘Evidentiality. Dutch 'seem' and 'appear' verbs: 'blijken', 'lijken', 'schijnen'’. Linguistics in the Netherlands 28. 125-137.
  • Willett, T. (1988). A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12. 51-97.
  • Yang, L. (2014). Evidentiality in English Research Articles of Applied Linguistics: From the Perspective of Metadiscourse. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 5(3). 581-591.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet