The impact of educational levels on formal and informal entrepreneurship

  1. Jiménez Palmero, Alfredo
  2. Palmero Cámara, María Carmen
  3. González Santos, Josefa
  4. González Bernal, Jerónimo
  5. Jiménez Eguizábal, Juan Alfredo
Revista:
Business Research Quarterly

ISSN: 2340-9444 2340-9436

Any de publicació: 2015

Volum: 18

Número: 3

Pàgines: 204-212

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.1016/J.BRQ.2015.02.002 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccés obert editor

Altres publicacions en: Business Research Quarterly

Objectius de Desenvolupament Sostenible

Resum

This paper studies the impact of formal education on entrepreneurship rates. We propose that different levels of education not only vary between each other in terms of their impact, but also according to whether we analysis either formal or informal entrepreneurship. Our results show that tertiary education increases formal entrepreneurship as a consequence of the higher self-confidence, lower perceived risk and enhanced human capital. At the same time, tertiary education also has a negative effect on informal entrepreneurship as it increases awareness of and sensitivity to the possible negative repercussions of this kind of activities. In addition, we show thatthe impact of secondary education on formal entrepreneurship is positive as well, although in this case the effect on informal entrepreneurship is not significant. Even though secondary education also increases awareness of the potential negative repercussions of informal entrepreneurship, this effect is counteracted by a lack of management skills.

Informació de finançament

Finançadors

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Agarwal R., Audretsch D.B., Sarkar M.B. The process of creative construction: knowledge spillovers, entrepreneurship, and economic growth. Strateg. Entrep. J. 2007, 1(3/4):263-286.
  • Ahlstrom D., Bruton G.D. Venture capital in emerging economies. Networks and institution change. Entrep. Theory Pract. 2006, 30(2):299-320.
  • Bates T. Self-employment entry across industry groups. J. Bus. Ventur. 1995, 10(2):143-156.
  • Baumol W.J. The Free-market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism 2004, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Baumol W.J., Strom R.J. Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Strateg. Entrep. J. 2007, 1(3/4):233-237.
  • Béchard J.P., Grégoire D. Entrepreneurship education research revisited: the case of higher education. Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ. 2005, 4(1):22-49.
  • Becker G.S. Human Capital 1964, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Blau P.M., Duncan O.D. The American Occupational Structure 1967, Wiley, New York.
  • Bitros G.C., Karayiannis A.D. Entrepreneurial morality: some indications from Greece. Eur. J. Int. Manag. 2010, 4(4):333-361.
  • Bruton G.D., Ahlstrom D., Obloj K. Entrepreneurship in emerging economies: where are we today and where should the research go in the future. Entrep. Theory Pract. 2008, 32(1):1-14.
  • Campbell C.A. A decision theory model for entrepreneurial acts. Entrep. Theory Pract. 1992, (Fall):21-27.
  • Coduras A., Levie J., Kelley D.J., Saemundsson J.R., Schott T. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Special Report: A Global Perspective on Entrepreneurship Education and Training 2010, Global Entrepreneurship Research Association, Wellesley, MA.
  • Davidsson P. Researching Entrepreneurship. International Studies in Entrepreneurship 2004, Springer Science Inc., Boston.
  • Davidsson P., Honig B. The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. J. Bus. Ventur. 2003, 8(3):301-331.
  • Dau L.A., Cuervo-Cazurra A. Structural reform and entrepreneurship. Working paper presentado en el 35th EIBA Annual Conference en Valencia 2009.
  • Delmar F., Davidsson P. Where do they come from? Prevalence and characteristics of nascent entrepreneurs. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 2000, 12(1):1-23.
  • DeTienne D., Chandler G. Opportunity identification and its role in the entrepreneurial classroom: a pedagogical approach and empirical test. Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ. 2004, 3(3):242-257.
  • De Wit G., Van Winden F.A.A.M. An empirical analysis of self-employment in the Netherlands. Small Bus. Econ. 1989, 1(4):263-272.
  • Dimitratos P., Jones M. Future directions for international entrepreneurship research. Int. Bus. Rev. 2005, 14(2):119-128.
  • Djankov S., La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A. The regulation of entry. Q. J. Econ. 2002, 117(1):1-37.
  • Evans D.S., Leighton L. Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. Am. Econ. Rev. 1989, 79:519-535.
  • Feito-Alonso R. Éxito escolar para todos. Rev. Iberoam. Educ. 2009, 50:131-151.
  • Fernández A.I., González F. How accounting and auditing systems can counteract risk-shifting and safety-nets in banking: some international evidence. J. Financ. Stab. 2005, 1(4):466-500.
  • Fiess N.M., Fugazza M., Maloney W.F. Informal self-employment and macroeconomic fluctuations. J. Dev. Econ. 2010, 91:211-226.
  • Freytag A., Thurik A.R. Entrepreneurship and its determinants in a cross country setting. J. Evol. Econ. 2007, 17(2):117-131.
  • Gauthier J.F. The Content of Secondary Education around the World: Present Position and Strategic Choices 2006, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Geneva.
  • GEM Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2008, http://www.gemconsortium.org/.
  • Gimeno J., Folta T., Cooper A., Woo C. Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Adm. Sci. Q. 1997, 42(4):750-783.
  • González I. Realización de un análisis discriminante explicativo del rendimiento académico en la universidad. Rev. Invest. Educ. 2004, 22(1):43-59.
  • Gössling T. The price of morality. An Analysis of personality, behaviour, and social rules in economic terms. J. Bus. Ethics 2003, 45:121-131.
  • Greene W.H. Econometric Analysis 2000, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. fourth ed.
  • Grilo I., Thurik R. Latent and actual entrepreneurship in Europe and the US: some recent developments. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 2005, 1(1):441-459.
  • Günther I., Launov A. Informal employment in developing countries: opportunity or last resort?. J. Dev. Econ. 2012, 97(1):88-98.
  • Hair J.F., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., Black W. Análisis Multivariante 1999, Prentice Hall, Madrid. fifth ed.
  • Hengsadeekul C., Koul R., Kaewkuekool S. Motivational orientation and preference for English-medium programs in Thailand. Int. J. Educ. Res. 2014, 66:33-44.
  • Honig B. Education and self employment in Jamaica. Comp. Educ. Rev. 1996, 40:177-193.
  • ILO Women and Men in the Informal Economy: A Statistical Picture 2002, International Labor Office, Ginebra.
  • Jiménez A., Luis-Rico I., Benito-Osorio D. The influence of political risk on the scope of internationalization of regulated companies: insights from a Spanish sample. J. World Bus. 2014, 10.1016/j.jwb.2013.06.001.
  • Jiménez-Eguizábal A., Palmero-Cámara C. New approaches to university in Spain: academic change, creative dimensions and ethical commitment in the establishment of the European Higher Education Area. J. Educ. Adm. Hist. 2007, 39(3):227-237.
  • Kaufmann D., Kraay A., Mastruzzi M. Governance matters VI: aggregate and individual governance indicators, 1996-2006. The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper Series 4280 2007.
  • Kennedy P.A. Guide to Econometrics 1992, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Klapper L.A.R., Guillén M.F., Quesada J.M. Entrepreneurship and firm formation across countries. The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper Series 4313 2007.
  • Lazear E.P. Entrepreneurship. J. Labor Econ. 2005, 23(4):649-680.
  • Levie J., Autio E. A theoretical grounding and test of the GEM model. Small Bus. Econ. 2008, 31(3):235-263.
  • Loayza N., Rigolini J. The economics of the informal sector: a simple model and some empirical evidence from Latin America. Carnegie Rochester Conf. Ser. Public Policy 2006, 45:129-162.
  • McClelland D.C. Power: The Inner Experience 1975, Irvington, New York.
  • McEwen C., Trede F. The value of workplace learning in the first year for university students from under-represented groups. Asia-Pac. J. Coop. Educ. 2014, 15(1):55-67.
  • Mincer J. Schooling Experience and Earnings 1974, Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Moya M. Worldwide Business Startups 2008, http://www.moyak.com/researcher/resume/papers/business_startups.html.
  • Neter J., Wasserman W., Kutner M.H. Applied Linear Statistical Models: Regression Analysis of Variance and Experimental Designs 1985, Irwin, Homewood. second ed.
  • North D.C. Institutions Institutional Change and Economic Performance 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Nystrom K. The institutions of economic freedom and entrepreneurship: evidence from panel data. Public Choice 2008, 136(3/4):269-282.
  • OCDE Four Future Scenarios for Higher Education 2008, OCDE, Paris.
  • Peterman N., Kennedy J. Enterprise education: influencing students 'perceptions of entrepreneurship'. Entrep. Theory Pract. 2003, 28:129-144.
  • Pozo J.I., Pérez Echeverría M.P. Psicología del aprendizaje universitario: la formación en competencias 2009, Morata, Madrid.
  • Reynolds P.D. Who starts new firms? Linear additive versus interaction based models. Small Bus. Econ. 1997, 9(5):449-462.
  • Rinaudo M.C., Chiecher A., Donolo D. Motivación y uso de estrategias en estudiantes universitarios Su evaluación a partir del Motivated Strategies Learning Questionnaire. An. Pscol. 2003, 19(1):107-119.
  • Schultz T. Investments in man: an economist's view. Soc. Serv. Rev. 1959, 33(2):69-75.
  • Shane S., Venkataraman S. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2000, 25(1):217-226.
  • Sopoaga F., Zaharic T., Kokaua J., Ekeroma A.J., Murray G., van der Meer J. Pacific students undertaking the first year of health sciences at the University of Otago, and factors associated with academic performance. N. Z. Med. J. 2013, 126(1384):96-108.
  • Studenmund A.H. Using Econometrics: A Practical Guide 1992, HarperCollins, New York.
  • Szyliowicz D., Galvin T. Applying broader strokes: extending institutional perspectives and agendas for international entrepreneurship research. Int. Bus. Rev. 2010, 19(4):317-332.
  • Uhlaner L., Thurik R. Postmaterialism influencing total entrepreneurial activity across nations. J. Evol. Econ. 2007, 17(2):161-185.
  • Uhlaner L.M., Thurik A.R., Hutjes J. Postmaterialism: A Cultural Factor Influencing Entrepreneurial Activity Across Nations. ERIM Report ERS 2002-62-STR 2002, Erasmus Research Institute for Management, Rotterdam.
  • UNESCO Secondary Education Reform, Towards a Convergence of Knowledge Acquisition and Skills Development 2005, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris.
  • UNESCO World Conference on Higher Education: The New Dynamics of Higher Education and Research for Societal Change and Development 2009, Communiqué United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris.
  • Valle A., Rodríguez S., Cabanach R.G., Núñez J.C., GonzálezPienda J.A. El estudiante eficaz 2007, CCS, Madrid.
  • Van Gelderen M., Jansen P. Autonomy as a start-up motive. J. Bus. Enterp. Dev. 2006, 13(10):23-32.
  • Walter S.G., Dohse D. The Interplay Between Entrepreneurship Education and Regional Knowledge Potential in Forming Entrepreneurial Intentions 2009, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, no. 1549, Kiel, Germany.
  • Webb J.W., Bruton G.D., Tihanyi L., Ireland R.D. Research on entrepreneurship in the informal economy: framing a research agenda. J. Bus. Ventur. 2013, 28(5):598-614.
  • Wennekers S., Thurik A.R. Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Bus. Econ. 1999, 13(1):27-55.
  • World Economic Forum Educating the Next Wave of Entrepreneurs: Unlocking Entrepreneurial Capabilities to Meet the Global Challenges of the 21st Century: A Report of the Global Education Initiative 2009, World Economic Forum, Switzerland. http://www.heritage.org/.
  • Zacharakis A.L., Bygrave W.D., Shepherd D.A. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: National Entrepreneurship Assessment: United States of America 2000, Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership, Kansas City.
  • Zimmerman B.J. Investigating self-regulation and motivation: historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. Am. Educ. Res. J. 2008, 45:166-183.
  • Zimmerman B.J., Schunk D. Motivation. An essential dimension of self-regulated learning. Motivation and Self-regulated Learning. Theory, Research and Applications 2008, 1-31. Lawrence Erlbaum, New York. D. Schunk, B.J. Zimmerman (Eds.).